Conversational Topic Preferences, Taboo Words and Euphemisms Used by Male and Female Teachers of Pangasinan State University-Sta.Maria Campus

  • Marlon Perado Pangasinan State University
Abstract views: 86 , PDF downloads: 142
Keywords: taboo word, euphemism, cathartic expressions, cuss word



Though teachers have the noblest profession, they are not exempted from using taboos and euphemisms. They also use a language they prefer to express themselves.

This paper investigates the conversational topic preferences, use of taboo words, euphemisms, and cathartic words of teachers. Results of the study revealed that (1) sex is the most preferred topic by male teachers while work-related matters are for females;

(2) in terms of topics that should be kept private, both groups dealt with personal lives; (3) both male and female teachers spill offensive words as cathartic expressions to show anger or fright; (4) when provoked, both respondents tend to utter harsh words to inflict insult or hurt on other people; (5) male utter more varied and more degrading expressions while females avoided the more insulting and derogatory cuss word; and (6) friends prove to be the most influential where they learn cuss words followed by media and neighborhood. 


Download data is not yet available.


Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Al-Khasawneh,F.D.L.(2018). An Intercultural Study of Euphemistic Strategies in Saudi
Arabic and American English.

Almayoadi, K.A. (2018). Euphemism as a Communicative Tool: A Descriptive Study of Hijazi and Southern Region Dialects Spoken in Saudi Arabia

Gao, C. (2013). A Sociolinguistic Study of English Taboo Language.

Ham, K. (2001). The Linguistics of Euphemism: A Diachronic Study of Euphemism Use and Formation. Published M.A Linguistics Thesis (TESOL). University of Surrey.2001

Hojati, A. (2012). A Study of Euphemisms in the Context of English-Speaking Media.
International Journal of Linguistics. ISSN 1948-5425. Vol.4,No.4.

Hudson, G. (2000). Essentials of Introductory Linguistics. USA: Blackwell Publishers.

Medriano, al., (2018). Conversational Topic, Preferences, Taboo Words and Euphemisms Used by ESL Philippine Male and Female Students s_taboo_words_and_euphemisms_used_by_ESL_Philippine_Male_and_female_studen ts
Montenegro, C.F. (1982). An Exploratory Study of Male and Female language in Pilipino. In M.L. Bautista (Ed.), Readings in Philippine Sociolinguistics.Manila: De La Salle University press.

Rabab’ah, G., & Al-Qarni, A. M. (2012). Euphemism in Saudi Arabic and British English.
Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 730-743.

Samoskaite, L. (2011). 21st Century Political euphemisms in English Newspapers: Semantic and Structural Study.
Sperber,D & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. CUP Sperber & Wilson (1987) Precis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition: Behavioral and Brain.London.

Tajolosa, T.(2012). Conversational Topic, Preferences, Taboo Words and Euphemisms:
The Case of Philippine Male and Female University Students. s_and_Euphemisms_The_Case_of_Philippine_Male_and_Female_University_Students

Widdowson, H.G. (1990). Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1990.

Wilson, K.G. (1993). The Columbia Guide to Standard American English.
How to Cite
Perado, M. (2023). Conversational Topic Preferences, Taboo Words and Euphemisms Used by Male and Female Teachers of Pangasinan State University-Sta.Maria Campus . IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 13-23.